The differences between common law and civil law systems.
From Ireland - Sherrifs Subordinate tries to seise Someones home who knows the Constitution and Common Law
True and correct: the outcome of Roger Hayes' hearing
True and correct: the outcome of Roger Hayes' hearing The true and correct: the outcome of Roger Hayes' hearing on the 28th of October was as follows.
The story so far.
Roger Hayes has refused to pay his council tax... until the council provide a contract so that he can hold them to account (democracy) and justify the massive amount of money they are spending (wasting). Council's response has been 'Pay up or else' - Roger chose the 'or else' option - the council obliged by trying to bankrupt him... Roger had the evidence on his side (justification for non-payment)... so the council employed the services of a corrupt judge Michael Peake. (This was the Judge arrested in the 7th March in Birkenhead - orchestrated by The British Constitution Group and many other groups/friends).
The bankruptcy was pushed through on a day when Roger could not attend. (cowards) The official receiver wrote to Roger telling him that he had been made bankrupt... and to fill in various documents. Roger wrote back saying he wasn't bankrupt... and that it was the legal fiction that had been made bankrupt and not his responsibility and NO he would not be filling in their documents. The Official receiver then told Roger... fill in the documents 'OR ELSE'... Being a true believer in consistency... Roger chose the 'OR ELSE' option. The court case on the 28th was an application for the court to ORDER Roger to complete their forms or be done for CONTEMPT OF COURT... i.e. prison.
10 mins before the court hearing at 10 am... the Official receiver approached Roger and asked... " Before we go in....?" - Roger anticipating the question and before they could finish... answered "NO" (they then confirmed they were going to ask if Roger would complete their docs).
Roger had also written to the court and the official receiver to advise that he would not consent to the hearing... but would attend to assist.
They then advised Roger that because he was so passionate in his beliefs... (meaning they knew he was right) and they BACKED DOWN. They asked the court for an indefinite adjournment (that must be a first)... which avoids them having to admit they have NO AUTHORITY over Roger Hayes THE MAN. Roger thus did not fill in their forms and remains a free man.
Conclusion.
1). The court avoided having to deal with the legal fiction issue (Whew for the court). 2). Roger controlled the outcome by withholding consent. 3). The Official receiver has confirmed that they have no authority... and finally 4). Roger does not have to pay his council tax because the council have no way of forcing him through the courts.
This is a victory and should be hailed as one. BUT... do not try this unless you are 1) PREPARED and 2) aware of all the implications.
Best wishes... and thanks for all the support. Now lets get on and win the war.
Roger Hayes.
Chairman. The British Constitution Group. www.thebcgroup.org.uk
The story so far.
Roger Hayes has refused to pay his council tax... until the council provide a contract so that he can hold them to account (democracy) and justify the massive amount of money they are spending (wasting). Council's response has been 'Pay up or else' - Roger chose the 'or else' option - the council obliged by trying to bankrupt him... Roger had the evidence on his side (justification for non-payment)... so the council employed the services of a corrupt judge Michael Peake. (This was the Judge arrested in the 7th March in Birkenhead - orchestrated by The British Constitution Group and many other groups/friends).
The bankruptcy was pushed through on a day when Roger could not attend. (cowards) The official receiver wrote to Roger telling him that he had been made bankrupt... and to fill in various documents. Roger wrote back saying he wasn't bankrupt... and that it was the legal fiction that had been made bankrupt and not his responsibility and NO he would not be filling in their documents. The Official receiver then told Roger... fill in the documents 'OR ELSE'... Being a true believer in consistency... Roger chose the 'OR ELSE' option. The court case on the 28th was an application for the court to ORDER Roger to complete their forms or be done for CONTEMPT OF COURT... i.e. prison.
10 mins before the court hearing at 10 am... the Official receiver approached Roger and asked... " Before we go in....?" - Roger anticipating the question and before they could finish... answered "NO" (they then confirmed they were going to ask if Roger would complete their docs).
Roger had also written to the court and the official receiver to advise that he would not consent to the hearing... but would attend to assist.
They then advised Roger that because he was so passionate in his beliefs... (meaning they knew he was right) and they BACKED DOWN. They asked the court for an indefinite adjournment (that must be a first)... which avoids them having to admit they have NO AUTHORITY over Roger Hayes THE MAN. Roger thus did not fill in their forms and remains a free man.
Conclusion.
1). The court avoided having to deal with the legal fiction issue (Whew for the court). 2). Roger controlled the outcome by withholding consent. 3). The Official receiver has confirmed that they have no authority... and finally 4). Roger does not have to pay his council tax because the council have no way of forcing him through the courts.
This is a victory and should be hailed as one. BUT... do not try this unless you are 1) PREPARED and 2) aware of all the implications.
Best wishes... and thanks for all the support. Now lets get on and win the war.
Roger Hayes.
Chairman. The British Constitution Group. www.thebcgroup.org.uk
Courts Afraid of Us Now & Lawful Bank - Roger Hayes British Constitution Group (hd)
Freemen On The Land
Be Advised that The Freeman path is not for everyone...you must be an Expert to go this way when you deal with the Police or Justice (Injustice) System, if you are not an Expert they have ways to deal with you.
In The USA
9th WAVE - GROUNDBREAKING US SUPREME COURT RULING - The Constitution Superceeds all other Laws and more
"On June 16, 2011, the US Supreme Court overturned a US Court of Appeal ruling; and, believe it or not, reasserted not only State sovereignty but individual sovereignty as well. And we thought the government was going to hell in a hand basket! This unanimous decision, as I see it, is a major turning point, a visible shift in consciousness of the ruling elite. All things are possible. Watch for miraculous reversals in the remainder of this 9th wave."
| englishmen_arrest_an_unlawful_common_law_judge_and_seize_his_court_oleron_law___-_youtube.flv |
Test -- If you are in the UK you may not be able to watch this - Censorship
On March 11th 2011 at Birkenhead England UK a mass of 400+ people gathered to support Roger Hayes at his bankruptcy hearing. Roger was set to arrest the presiding judge who was acting against the countrys COMMON LAW which is the Constitutional Law of England. He did make an arrest witnessed by a court room full of supporters who took over the court. The police however let the judge free, thus committing miscreance making them guilty of aiding in a crime. This video brings you into the hustle and bustle of the outside of the court and the excellent address as Roger and co. leave the
Protestors storm Birkenhead county court and attempt to arrest judge Mar 7 2011 by Liam Murphy CHAOTIC scenes broke out at Birkenhead county court today after demonstrators attempted to arrest a judge and then took over a court. They were at court for a case brought by Wirral Council against Roger Hayes for non payment of council tax. Mr Hayes questioned the legitimacy of the court and then attempted to arrest district judge Michael Peake. The judge was quickly ushered out of court room one and then demonstrators took it over - one even taking the judge's seat. Police reinforcements arrived and an hour-long stand off occurred. Hamilton, Market and Hinderton Streets were closed off, and police formed a cordon outside the court while hundreds of protectors gathered outside.
|
|
THIS STORY WAS UPDATED AS THE SITUATION DEVELOPED AT THE COUNTY COURT YESTERDAY.
Protestors have "civilly arrested" a judge at Birkenhead county court. A crowd of several hundred people has massed around the court. Police have begun forcibly ejecting protestors from the court in chaotic scenes. Made up of people from across the UK, the marchers say they are exerting their "ancient right to lawful Rebellion under Magna Carta." Around 20 police vehicles are now in attendance and several dozen officers are at the scene, some with dogs. The crowd, although largely peaceful, is chanting "freedom" and "arrest that judge." Some have sat down in the road blocking in a police van and are refusing to let it pass. The area around the county court at Hamilton Street and Market Street is now closed to vehicles by police cordon. The protestors are handing out leaflets from the "British Constitution Group." The demonstration was apparently sparked when one of the prominent voices in the BCG, Wirral man Roger Hayes, faced a bankruptcy hearing for non-payment of his council tax. The BCG's main aim is a rallying call for "lawful rebellion." In 1997, Mr Hayes stood for election in Wallasey representing the Referendum Party against sitting MP Angela Eagle. He polled 1,490 votes and finished fourth. The Referendum Party was a single-issue party that emerged in the 90s calling for a vote on the UK's relationship with the European Union. One of the protestors who had travelled up for the demonstration from Coventry said: "The purpose of today is to generally to get a feel of how unsatisfied people are with the governing of the country. "I wouldn’t say I was angry, just dissatisfied. I believe that the power is distributed unfairly at this point in time. “I believe that the people who are in control are morally defunct. "I don't think they are serving the interests of those they are supposed to be serving." The BCG website says: "We, the British People have a right to govern ourselves. "That right has been subjugated as a consequence of acts of treason having been committed by the collective political establishment, aided and abetted by corrupt segments of the judiciary, the police, the Church and the civil service." |
Republic of Missouri, The CHANGE Your Founders Believed In
|
Before one trys this be sure you are an Expert first because the Lawmen will trick you and punish for defying their system.
These are found at this website and should help explain the perspective on being a Freeman. Freeman On The Land Website http://www.fmotl.com/ http://www.fmotl.com/FundamentalsIndex.htm 1. 'Lawful' 2. 'Power' (and scope) 3. 'Majority' (and scope) 4. Personal Power .vs. Power vested in Representatives 5. 'Permission' and 'Licencing' 6. 'Registration' 7. Diffusion of Rights into Statute-designated privileges 8. 'Services' and 'Benefits' accordingly 9. Law and 'fictions' 10. Making a 'Claim' 11. Court de facto .vs. Court de jure 12. 'Wealth' and 'Ownership' of a Nation 13. 'Society' 14. Contractual obligation 15. Agreement to pay 16. "I feel guilty, because I owe the money" 17. 'Responsibility' .vs. 'Authority' |
English Freeman Standing In Court - Gloucester CourtFreeman Conference UK Part 1I, JOHN JAMES HARRIS DO DECLARE that as from and including this present date, and for all such time as may now be required to restore Elizabeth the Queen to Her Freedom and to The Lawful Dignity & Authority of her Crown, I DENY AND WITHHOLD ALL ALLEGIANCE AND OBEDIENCE TO ELIZABETH THE QUEEN, to the precise purpose of providing some defence to Her Majesty’s Person; Royal Estate and Freedoms, by the process of denying all and any lawful recognition to those Evil Persons who now hold Her Majesty captive to their own Treasons; Evil Designs and Unlawful Purposes, contrary to law –
I NOW DECLARE to All Persons claiming a legal authority to exercise the power of government, in the name of Elizabeth the Queen that their authority to govern me in any way whatsoever is both DENIED and ENDED. Click here to view second official Affidavit. I HEREBY PLACE ON RECORD of all persons that I, John James Harris after said lawful process have entered into Lawful rebellion, which is my right under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 and therefore have become, from this 1st day of May 2008, a Freeman of England within the Freedom of Common Law. I NOW DECLARE MYSELF (which is my right after said lawful process) FREE from all Chastisement, Laws, Taxes accorded to the state and any obligations there unto – Second Affidavit of John Harris WHEREAS It Is Now Made Plain To Me that Elizabeth the Queen has been entirely deposed from her Freedoms; Crown; Authority & Dignity, by the devious machinations of traitors and by all of those evil persons who have formerly or do now support the enterprises of treason, contrary to the Laws of God and contrary to the known laws and customs of the kingdom and people of England - AND WHEREAS the said Elizabeth the Queen is now entirely deposed from her lawful power and authority to Govern the Nations & Peoples of the United Kingdom, with Northern Ireland – AND WHEREAS the said Elizabeth the Queen has been and is now unlawfully restrained from providing a full and adequate response to the content and requirements of an affidavit that I have served upon her in a lawful manner – NOW I, JOHN HARRIS currently resident at (address supplied to Her Majesty), being the son of John James Harris (also known as Jack Harris) deceased, formerly resident at (address supplied to Her Majesty) who was during his lifetime a loyal and true servant of the Crown and who was during his lifetime employed as a Personal Chauffeur to Sir David and Lady Bowes Lyons and to Her Majesty the Queen, from time to time - MAKE OATH AND SAY AS FOLLOWS – FOR THE REASONS GIVEN within the content of the preamble to this present document, I Must and Do Now Remove Myself from All and Any Allegiance to Elizabeth the Queen, to the purpose of removing myself at law from the authority of all of those Hateful & Evil Persons who have taken it upon themselves to hold Elizabeth the Queen a prisoner in her own land – and or who have taken it upon themselves to misgovern the United Kingdom in the Queen’s Name, by the process of laying an unlawful claim to the True Authority of Elizabeth the Queen; such claim to the Royal Authority being entirely contrary to the known and most ancient laws and customs of the realm and being most clearly an expression of Treason. I DECLARE that as from and including this present date, and for all such time as may now be required to restore Elizabeth the Queen to Her Freedom and to The Lawful Dignity & Authority of her Crown, I DENY AND WITHHOLD ALL ALLEGIANCE AND OBEDIENCE TO ELIZABETH THE QUEEN, to the precise purpose of providing some defence to Her Majesty’s Person; Royal Estate and Freedoms, by the process of denying all and any lawful recognition to those Evil Persons who now hold Her Majesty captive to their own Treasons; Evil Designs and Unlawful Purposes, contrary to law - AND TO THE FURTHER PURPOSE that my own Security and Safety under the Rule of those Laws that are my inalienable birthright may be safeguarded against the threats to Freedom & Liberty now being posed by Divers Evil Persons, contrary to law. I NOW DECLARE to All Persons claiming a legal authority to exercise the power of government, in the name of Elizabeth the Queen that their authority to govern me in any way whatsoever is both denied and ended. I FURTHER DECLARE to all such persons that my personal freedom comes directly to me from God Himself, and that the walls and doors of all and any prisons now under the control of Traitors to the Crown & People of the United Kingdom will crack wide and will open at the behest of God Himself, if they should seek to impose penalty upon me for my departure from their mischiefs. FINALLY, I give Full Notice & Assurance that I will return to my allegiance and obedience to the Person; Estate & Imperial Crown of Elizabeth the Queen when Her Majesty is entirely released from the bondage that now prevents her from the free exercise of her lawful authority and duty to Govern Her Peoples in accordance with their own laws & customs; which authority requires Her to Defend Her Peoples; Her Kingdoms; Her Realms and Her Territories in full accordance with the terms of the Oath that was Sworn before Almighty God & The People on 2nd June, 1953. THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND is my birthright and at any future time of returning to a condition of Full Allegiance and Obedience to the authority of Elizabeth the Queen, I will require and expect to receive The Queen’s Own Freely-Given Assurance that the government of my country will from that same time be conducted in full accordance with the laws and customs of my people; which laws and customs require and demand that the activities of all and any parliaments and governments of the United Kingdom be constrained to act within those provisions of the law that provide for the existence of such parliaments and governments. May God in His Mercy, Defend the Right & May God Save the Queen from those who now hold her in an Unlawful Captivity. |